Karim Aïnouz: ‘I was interested in questioning the safe space of contemporary cinema‘

Featured image Karim Anouz I was interested in questioning the safe space of contemporary cinema

The world of cinema often seeks comfort, but sometimes, the most compelling stories emerge from disruption and provocation. This is the engine behind the creation of Rosebush Pruning, a challenging new treatise on family life that pushes boundaries in a way few films dare to attempt.

Brazilian-Algerian director Karim Aïnouz found his creative momentum through collaborations built on shared intellectual curiosity. His pursuit of satire led him to reimagine classic narratives, and with screenwriter Efthimis Filippou, he embarked on an artistic journey that explored the unsettling beauty of damaged human connections.

The pairing of Aïnouz and Filippou was not immediately obvious; their cinematic styles might seem disparate at first glance. However, what connected them was a shared appreciation for humour, irony, and a deep-seated sense of humanity. Their initial connection, sparked during the pandemic, quickly evolved into a fruitful partnership where they looked at the core of family not as dysfunctional units, but as complex, deeply wounded entities.

This collaborative spirit extended to the visual language of the film itself. Aïnouz’s work is often defined by profound intimacy, and his rapport with cinematographer Hélène Louvart exemplifies this. Their working relationship is marked by precision and an almost obsessive focus on light, allowing characters to inhabit their atmosphere with palpable emotional truth.

The artistic choices throughout the project reflected this desire for a world infused with mood. The soundtrack selection was conceptual, utilizing Pet Shop Boys’ ‘Paninaro’ from the very first draft—a choice reflecting the feeling of losing identity and becoming assimilated in a changing world. It was a deliberate splash of irony, suggesting that how we access identity, whether through fashion or music, is inherently aspirational and often contradictory.

This exploration naturally led to a deeper philosophical questioning of what cinema is supposed to deliver. Aïnouz was drawn to the kind of filmmaking that creates discomfort, challenging the traditional notion that empathy must be the sole measure of a cinematic experience. He questioned the “safe space” of contemporary film, arguing that true disruption and excitement often come from confronting the outrageous.

By looking toward figures like John Waters and Pedro Almodóvar, Aïnouz sought out the energy of camp and scandal—a sense of scatological and outrageousness that injects an exciting disruption into the cinematic experience. This perspective suggests that what truly fascinates us in art may not be simple understanding, but the exhilarating shock delivered by carefully constructed chaos.

Buy on Amazon