Ross McElwee on “Remake” and “Sherman’s March”

Born in North Carolina and currently based near Harvard, Ross McElwee stands as one of the most original and consistently excellent nonfiction filmmakers of the last fifty years. Having taught filmmaking since 1986, his work navigates the complex terrain of history, personal grief, and the human condition.

His powerful new film, Remake—a meditation on the passing of his son Adrian, who was a regular presence in McElwee’s later work—is currently playing exclusively at New York’s Film Forum through July 16th, following nine months of festival screenings. While plans for a wider release remain undecided, the film continues to bring profound questions about loss into focus.

McElwee’s filmography is deeply interwoven with his life story. Forty years have passed since the release of his first feature, Sherman’s March (1986), a cinematic masterpiece that explored a director’s ability to find art within behind-the-scenes disaster. That initial project involved retracing Union General William Tecumseh Sherman’s campaign through the South, but it was quickly layered with McElwee’s personal musings on the cultural aftershocks of the Civil War, the threat of nuclear extinction, and interviews with women.

His work continually circles back to deep emotional experiences. Films like Charleen (1977) explored his friendship with poet Charleen Swansea, while Time Indefinite (1993) delves into the profound losses of family and relationships. Even Photographic Memory (2011) served as an unwitting prequel to the agonies seen in Remake, detailing McElwee’s uneasy relationship with his son Adrian as he navigated mental illness and addiction.

McElwee’s filmmaking style is characterized by a deep sensitivity to pain. He reflects on the difficulty of translating devastating loss into images, noting that the process has been a long journey. When discussing his experience grieving for Adrian, he found that simply doing nothing—refraining from writing or thinking about film—was the necessary first step.

This quest for meaning led him to examine the nature of memory itself. He reflected on how people cope with loss, referencing the ideas of Joan Didion regarding memories and pain, suggesting that memories can sometimes be what we no longer wish to cherish.

In exploring the act of observation and reality in filmmaking, McElwee posited a fundamental tension between capturing life and living it. He referenced the stark distinction: This is not art, this is life. This philosophy underscores the caution inherent in seeking to film personal moments, especially during times of trauma.

His journey has also involved examining how society perceives suffering. McElwee reflects on the evolution of recognizing mental illness and addiction, noting that while recent notices for loved ones are increasingly forthcoming about these realities, there remains a profound difficulty in public and private spaces to fully reckon with personal tragedy.

Ultimately, McElwee’s work offers a powerful sense of solace. By sharing his journey—and by allowing audiences to witness the complexity of grief through art—he suggests that even amid unimaginable pain, we are not alone. It is this shared experience that gives his films their enduring, vital impact.

Buy on Amazon