Ben Affleck’s Animals Netflix isn’t thrilling review
The Ultimate Trap: Why Ben Affleck’s <Animals> is a Cinematic Nightmare
There are films that merely entertain, and then there are films that burrow under your skin, leaving you questioning reality long after the credits roll. Ben Affleck’s <Animals> falls firmly into the latter category. Netflix has presented this kidnapping thriller as some sort of cinematic masterpiece, but we are here to tell you that calling it the “ultimate” movie is a generous exaggeration—we mean it in the most decidedly negative sense.
From the opening scene, the film establishes a terrifying premise that immediately attempts to escalate, weaving a tapestry of suspense that, by the final act, feels less like a tightly plotted thriller and more like a series of poorly executed, desperate gambles. Affleck’s performance is certainly intense, delivering a performance filled with raw desperation, but the script struggles to match the visceral intensity of the situation it attempts to portray.
The tension is certainly present, but it often feels manufactured rather than earned. The film relies heavily on cliffhangers and frantic pacing, trying to keep the audience on edge, yet the underlying narrative logic frequently unravels under the pressure of its own contrived scenarios. It’s the kind of movie that promises high-stakes drama but delivers frustratingly thin emotional substance.
Ultimately, <Animals> is a stark reminder that not every high-budget, high-profile project translates into quality storytelling. While it serves as a reminder of what spectacular cinematic projects can attempt, it remains a cautionary tale. If you are looking for a genuinely gripping, meticulously crafted kidnapping thriller, you might find your satisfaction elsewhere. This film is an experience, certainly, but one that leaves you more exasperated than exhilarated.
Buy on Amazon
Credit
