Early reactions to The Uprising with Andrew Garfield
Rise Up
The cinematic landscape has just been shaken by the premiere of The Uprising, a film that channels the raw fury of historical rebellion into a modern, visceral experience. Directed and penned by Paul Greengrass, the movie has quickly become a major talking point, especially following the return of star Andrew Garfield to the screen. While the film emerged from a previous identity shift, it has solidified its place as a compelling piece of historical drama, exploring themes of revolt and rage with undeniable intensity.
At the heart of the story is the dramatic conflict of the Peasants Revolt, framed by the struggle against King Richard II. Greengrass, alongside a talented production team including Jason Blum, Gregory Goodman, Joanna Kaye, Joe Neurauter, and Lars Sylvest, has delivered a gritty and grounded epic. The visual style, often characterized by Greengrass’s signature handheld intensity, provides a kinetic energy that captures the chaos and urgency of the uprising.
Garfield, playing the archetypal everyman swept up in the violence, delivers a performance that is both powerful and deeply emotional. He manages to wring out a potent mix of vulnerability and righteous anger, becoming the embodiment of the revolution. This powerful performance is anchored by a stellar supporting ensemble, including Jamie Bell, Thomasin McKenzie, Cosmo Jarvis, Stephen Dillane, Jonny Lee Miller, Woody Norman, Katherine Waterston, and Sky Yang, each contributing compelling, fiery work.
The critical response to The Uprising has been sharply divided, reflecting the film’s intense style. Some critics have hailed the work as a masterpiece of cinematic urgency. Entertainment reporter Jonathan Sim praised the film, noting that it tells a “harrowing tale of rebellion,” highlighting Greengrass’s phenomenal action and Garfield’s powerful rage, calling the experience “dark, tragic, and captivating.”
However, not all reviews landed with the same impact. While the kinetic energy of the film is undeniable, some felt the execution fell short of the promise. Critics noted that while the action sequences were effective, the film’s breakneck pace and visual approach, while great for chaos, sometimes detracted from the emotional depth needed to fully explore the historical anger. Some reviewers found that the screenplay needed more substance to flesh out the characters and dig deeper beneath the surface.
One reviewer pointed out that while the film was thrilling and handsomely crafted, it needed more emotional heft to be truly memorable. Others, like Matt Neglia, acknowledged the effectiveness of the shaky-cam during action but felt it was distracting in quieter moments, suggesting the film didn’t fully rise to the occasion. Conversely, some viewers found the overall execution to be a misfire, arguing that while the acting was exceptional, the screenplay, visuals, and editing ultimately held the film back from being perfect.
Despite these mixed opinions, the film has clearly struck a chord. Pastor DeWayne Hamby, for instance, loved the experience, describing it as an epic historical story told in a gritty and grounded manner, praising Garfield’s powerful performance and Greengrass’s direction as delivering one of the year’s best films.
Buy on Amazon
Credit
